Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
From an astrological standpoint, Saturn has moved from Scorpio to Sagittarius which explains the reduction of John Boehner, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton in political power. All of whom are Scorpios. Donald Trump is a Gemini which is adverse to Sagittarius. The universe has selected Donald Trump to counterbalance the winds of Saturn in Sagittarius. He will likely face a lot of conflict the next two years. His voice is likely to become severely weakened after Saturn moves into Capricorn in December 2017.
I also find it fascinating that Hilary’s birthday is 10/26 and Melania’s birthday is 4/26. They are complete opposite poles of the zodiac.
When Uranus enters Taurus in May of 2018, Melania may be better prepared to deal with those headwinds. Look for her to take on a bigger role as Urnanus enters Taurus and her 70 year old husband ages.
Do not be surprised if you see significant conflict between Melania Trump and fellow Taurus Mark Zuckerberg. Melania has already vowed to make online bullying on social media her top priority as First Lady.
Mary Claire Cheney (born March 14, 1969) is the second daughter of Dick Cheney, the formerVice President of the United States, and his wife, Lynne Cheney. She is politically conservative and is involved with a number of political action groups.
|Company name||Symbol||Market cap||P/E ratio||Div yield (%)||52w price change (%)|
|Alaska Air Group, Inc.||ALK||6.43B||11.67||1.06||53.60|
|Daimler AG (USA)||DDAIF||98.85B||11.46||3.27||70.23|
|Delta Air Lines, Inc.||DAL||30.88B||2.91||0.65||116.76|
|Elbit Systems Ltd. (USA)||ESLT||2.52B||12.67||2.02||41.49|
|L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.||LLL||9.93B||13.54||2.08||42.56|
|Lexmark International Inc||LXK||2.65B||10.84||3.37||44.43|
|Lincoln National Corporation||LNC||12.63B||10.58||1.33||43.07|
|LyondellBasell Industries NV||LYB||49.93B||13.55||3.08||48.01|
|Northrop Grumman Corporation||NOC||26.00B||13.57||2.03||60.70|
|Seagate Technology PLC||STX||17.28B||11.77||3.22||47.68|
|Symetra Financial Corporation||SYA||2.38B||10.48||1.94||53.05|
|The Dow Chemical Company||DOW||59.94B||12.99||3.04||43.79|
|The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company||GT||6.18B||11.62||0.80||99.76|
|Valero Energy Corporation||VLO||30.36B||11.49||1.76||51.05|
According to Ms. Grace, another corporate challenge that’s been getting a lot of press: JPMorgan shareholders will vote today on whether current Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon (dubbed one of the world’s most powerful bankers), gets to keep both jobs — or be “demoted” to just CEO. Frankly, a decision to split the jobs between two people would be consistent with the break ups suggested by the Uranus-Pluto square — and Mr. Dimon’s horoscope (even without a birthtime) is directly impacted.
For more of Ms. Grace’s perspective, please check out her site@: http://www.graceastrology.com/tag/jamie-dimon-horoscope-astrology/
Seems Mr. Dimon has a penchant for quoting Mr. Einstien:
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.”
According to Melkulangara Bhadrakumar: Everything about North Korea has to be speculative. That has been and is still the main problem. But one speculation seems to be ending, finally. It concerns China’s apparent ambivalence about North Korea’s nuclear program. Increasingly, Beijing is coming out on the ‘right side of history’.
Which in turn would unleash a host of profound consequences for the security of the Asia-Pacific and global politics as a whole, and, most important, for the future of what China’s new leader Xi Jinping enigmatically alluded to – but left undefined – as his “two great powers” concept during his visit to the United States last year when he was still a mere ‘princeling’.
Indeed, as the ‘breaking news’ accrued out of the bits and pieces of information of an obscure earthquake in North Korea early on Tuesday and it dawned on the world that the hermit kingdom has probably conducted its third underground nuclear test, all eyes began turning to China. For China watchers on the whole this is a veritable feast for the mind – how the new leadership in China would cope with a major foreign policy challenge – the second challenge simultaneously, in fact, if one were to add the feud between China and Japan over the disputed islands in the East China Sea.
At the end of the day, it transpires that Xi’s predecessor Hu Jintao kept voicing counsels of reason to Pyongyang but also kept the North Korean economy uninterruptedly supplied with food, fuel and investment and virtually kept the international community at bay by restraining its hands from imposing punitive sanctions. In effect, the impression becomes unavoidable that Hu shielded North Korea from international outcry and tacitly tolerated North Korea’s nuclear program.
Then came the long-range missile launch by North Korea in December and Beijing’s stunning decision to join the United States in backing the United Nations sanctions against Pyongyang. The conventional wisdom at that point was that China would soon afterward revert to its “default position” on North Korea, as it had done many a time in the past. The interesting thing, in retrospect, is that things didn’t exactly happen that way. On the contrary, when Pyongyang let go a fierce attack on Beijing for signing on to the US-led sanctions at the UN Security Council and it threatened with a nuclear test in the downstream, China began publicly ticking off North Korea – although limited to the English-language media that is meant for the consumption of the world opinion.
There is no question that the editorial in the state-owned Global Times newspaper last week penned by Zhang Liangui, a North Korea expert who advises the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee needs to be taken seriously. The editorial was predicated on the assumption that Pyongyang would go ahead with the nuclear test no matter what it takes, and looking at the downstream it warned that North Korea would “pay a heavy price” in terms of China’s goodwill. The salient of the editorial was its unambiguous warning that Pyongyang would be wrong to (mis)calculate that it can play China against the United States – “Pyongyang shouldn’t misread China. China won’t put its relations with Pyongyang above other strategic interests.”
Clearly, China’s political relationship with Pyongyang has touched a low point. But then, what about China’s longstanding priorities? These are: no war on the Korean Peninsula; no destabilization of the North Korean regime; and, a nuclear-weapon-free Korean Peninsula. China may balk but humanitarian considerations will remain and the long-term relationship cannot be abandoned just like that. Besides, North Korea has acted as a crucial buffer against the US troops based in South Korea and Japan. Furthermore, against the backdrop of the US’ rebalancing in Asia and China’s troubled relations with Japan, Beijing needs to hedge and it can, therefore, at best afford to press the ‘pause’ button at this point.
China also can ill afford to be distracted by another foreign policy crisis on its doorstep when the mounting domestic problems require great attention. Clearly, China finds itself between a rock and a hard place with the North Korean nuclear test. By a curious coincidence, the nuclear test took place even as the Year of the Snake slithers in. Snake years have historically had a geopolitical bite – Pearl Harbor (1941), Tiananmen Square massacre (1989), 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington (2011). By the way, Xi himself was born in the snake year of 1953.
To read Melkulangara Bhadrakumar’s article: “A Bomb in the Year of the Snake,” check out http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/02/14/a-bomb-in-the-year-of-the-snake.html